Monday, March 17, 2014

Cheating on Gold Juniors...

www.cfb.ae


That junior gold miner you fancy – will you still love it tomorrow...?
 
DEREK MacPHERSON is a mining analyst at M.Partners in Toronto. Previously doing mining research for a bank-owned investment dealer, he spent six years working as a metallurgist before starting in finance.
 
Now he says investors have again begun flirting with the junior mining sector after the wipe-out losses of 2013. But will it lead to a love affair or is it just a tryst...?
 
Here Derek Macpherson tells The Gold Report why he thinks it's too early to take on high-risk, high-leverage names.
 
The Gold Report: Canada's Globe and Mail reports that gold miners wrote off $17 billion in 2013. Does that encourage investors seeking greater exposure to precious metals to ignore the bigger names and look more closely at small-cap gold and silver equities?
 
Derek Macpherson: I think it makes investors a little more selective. During the last upturn in the gold market many of the big-cap companies purchased and built large, lower-grade projects; these projects have seen the majority of the write-downs over the last two years. This does not necessarily mean that there are no good big-cap mining equities; but it forces investors to be selective. However, many of the small-cap equities have undeservedly sold-off with their larger peers. We believe this creates an opportunity for investors to selectively add to their portfolios.
 
TGR: The junior mining sector is seeing some renewed interest from suitors, but is not yet the market darling. Do you believe this investor flirtation is likely to lead to a long-term love affair or is it more akin to a tryst?
 
Derek Macpherson: I think it's a little too early to tell. We're at the first or second date stage and we don't know whether this is the one or if it's a short-term fling. It is still too early to be investing in high-risk, high-leverage names. It fits well with our investment thesis and what we talked about the last time we spoke, which was that we like low-risk names even in the early stages of this rising gold price environment.
 
TGR: Low-risk names. Would you deem this a value sector right now?
 
Derek Macpherson: There are definitely some value plays in the sector, names that have been unjustly sold off, and there are some opportunities to catch them as they come back and their businesses recover.
 
TGR: In your last interview with The Gold Report you said, "In a rising gold price environment there was more room for error, and setbacks didn't have as large an impact on project economics." We're now in a modest rising gold price environment yet a number of companies have trimmed costs including some that you cover. Is this a sweet spot?
 
Derek Macpherson: If we are in a longer-term gold price rally, the best time to get in is at the very beginning. The thing that drives up or is perceived to drive up the gold price is inflation, which is also what drives up underlying costs, something we saw in the last cycle. Early on it was a great time to get in and it was a great time to build projects. That's when the most money was made. Then as the market got a little bit more frothy, we saw costs start to chase the gold price up and margins started to contract. Now is the time for investors to start taking a second look at the mining equities and start to invest.
 
TGR: Nonetheless, these equities present significant risk. Grade, jurisdiction and a simple mine plan/geology are common ways companies mitigate investor risk in this sector. In your coverage universe, how would you rank those?
 
Derek Macpherson: We view grade and simple mine plan/geology as 1A and 1B. With high grades there is more room for error, helping derisk a project. Similarly, a simple mine plan, like most heap-leach projects, also creates that lower risk environment. Companies don't necessarily need higher grades for that. Second would be jurisdiction. A company can take a little bit more jurisdiction risk with minimal impact, but if the grade or the mine plan doesn't work, the project doesn't work.
 
TGR: Are there some other risk mitigators that ought to be included in that list?
 
Derek Macpherson: There are two other things that investors sometimes overlook: management and the balance sheet. They will see a great project with great grade, but they will often overlook the management team. A company needs a strong management team to deliver on a project's potential. In this environment, there are good management teams out there that have done it before, which help derisk a project. The second thing that sometimes is overlooked is the balance sheet. Investors definitely want companies with balance sheet flexibility – low debt and a strong cash balance – which helps derisk projects, particularly as they are ramping up.
 
TGR: Some of these junior equities have seen dramatic price rises since the beginning of the year and even before that in some cases. There was a bit of a rally in late 2013. How should investors approach those names? With caution?
 
Derek Macpherson: Investors need to make sure a company has strong fundamentals and a valuation that should allow the rally to continue. Some of those names that have really moved in late December and early January were coming off tax-loss selling. We saw a number of equities rally on that alone, going down toward the end of 2013 with tax-loss selling and then rebounding in early 2014. From a trading perspective, after a strong rally investors want to wait for equities to take a pause, or even pull back a little, before stepping into names that continue to have attractive valuations.
 
TGR: You cover some companies that are now mining base metals. What's a brief forecast for zinc and copper?
 
Derek Macpherson: We continue to prefer zinc to copper. With a number of large zinc mines coming offline and few ready to be built, we think that there's an opportunity for zinc to recover. While we are bullish on zinc in the medium term, near term we are only modestly bullish because of the amount of inventory that's in the LME warehouses that has to be worked off before the likely supply deficit starts to impact pricing.
 
For copper there are a number of large projects sitting out there. While some of them have been delayed and that takes the pressure off the oversupply in the near term, any kind of bullish move in copper could move those projects back into the construction pipeline. We're a little bit more neutral on copper and its pricing going forward.
 
If investors are going to be in that mid-cap base metals space they need to stay with companies that have material growth to support the current multiples. We suggest that investors look a little further down cap and look at the discounted valuations in the base metals space.
 
TGR: Any parting thoughts to leave with us?
 
Derek Macpherson: We're starting to see some positive signs in the precious metals space. While we like what we're seeing currently, I think investors should still continue to be selective and focus on low-risk names in this early stage. If this is the early stage of a longer-term rally, we think that's where the money is going to flow first.


Contact Us:

Direct:04-3841906
Web: www.cfb.ae
Email:info@cfb.ae

For more information please visit our website century financial brokers.
Here are some useful links that you can follow:

Here is a CFB blog that gives useful daily Gold Analysis on dailybasis.
You can also follow CFB on facebook (useful advice on posts regularly)

Here is another blog that provides regular news and information and is very useful for Forex Signals.